Virtuoso Award entries are evaluated against the global standard of the communications profession using IABC’s Seven-point Scale of Excellence.
Each entry is thoroughly examined and scored by trained evaluators, ensuring that you receive a fair evaluation with meaningful feedback that can be applied to future work.
It’s important to note that with the exception of Best of the Best awards, the Virtuoso Awards is not a competitive awards program. Rather than competing against your peers, entries are scored against the global standard of the profession. There are no limitations to the number of awards presented in any given category.
IABC London is committed to continuous improvement of our Virtuoso Awards program. Over the past few years, we’ve updated our scoring thresholds to align with recommendations from IABC International. Entries are scored against the global standard of the profession using the ‘Seven-Point Scale of Excellence.’ To win an Award of Merit, an entry must score between 5.0 and 5.11. To win an Award of Excellence, entries must score between 5.12 and 7.0.
Best of the Best Awards are awarded to the top scoring entries in each division. In order for a Best of the Best to be awarded, there must be at least two entries in the division that have earned an Award of Excellence.
Entries are scored by unbiased, carefully selected evaluators from our local communications, marketing and creative industries. This allows us to select qualified professionals who meet set criteria, and ensure they are consistently trained to evaluate fairly and provide meaningful feedback on your work.
- IABC London will recruit local Virtuoso Awards evaluators. In order to be selected, an evaluator must have a minimum of five years of professional communication experience. To express your interest in evaluating for the Virtuoso Awards, please complete our online form by April 21, 2023.
- Every evaluator will be required to complete the online IABC Awards Evaluation Training module – the same training that is required to evaluate IABC International Gold Quill Award entries. If an evaluator does not complete this training, they will not be assigned any entries.
- Each evaluator will also be required to register on the Virtuoso Awards submission platform, which will also be used to facilitate award evaluations.
- Each Virtuoso Awards entry will be evaluated by a minimum of two evaluators. Every effort will be made to pair senior evaluators who have more experience with those who may be evaluating awards for the first time. Aligning with standard practice followed by IABC International, the two evaluators will need to meet (by phone or virtually) to discuss their assigned entry/entries. The two evaluators will need to come to an agreement on the same score for each section of the entry (see score sheets) before inputting and submitting their scores. Each evaluator will also be required to provide meaningful feedback on each entry they score.
- If the assigned evaluators cannot come to an agreement on the scoring of their entry, they will notify the Awards Chair and the entry will be reassigned to two new evaluators.
- Each evaluator will be instructed to identify any conflicts of interest. If a conflict of interest is identified, the evaluator(s) will be responsible for notifying the Awards Chair and the entry will be reassigned to two new evaluators. In the event that an entry is declared as a conflict of interest with multiple evaluators, the Awards Chair will seek trained evaluators from neighbouring chapters to evaluate the entry.
- Entries are scored out of seven following IABC’s Seven-point Scale of Excellence. All entries that score between 5.0 and 5.11 will receive an Award of Merit. All those entries that score above 5.12 will receive an Award of Excellence. There are no limitations to the number of awards presented in any given category. In addition, the top-scoring entries from each division will receive a Best of the Best Award. In order for a Best of the Best to be awarded, there must be at least two entries in the division that have earned an Award of Excellence.
- Results, including entry scores and feedback, will be delivered to entrants by summer 2023. Those who win a Virtuoso Award will be asked to provide additional information for recognition and will be given the opportunity to order additional award statuettes at a cost.
- If there are any objections to the scores received, the entry will be re-evaluated by two senior evaluators (every effort will be made to ensure they have evaluated Gold Quill entries in the past). The decisions following this second review will be final.
- Award winners will be celebrated at the Virtuoso Awards Celebration. Best of the Best Awards will be announced at the event. Up to three of the top-scoring entrants in each Division will be notified before the event that they are in the running for a Best of the Best Award.
Scoring & Evaluation Criteria
Scoring and evaluation criteria for the Virtuoso Awards is aligned to that used by IABC Awards programs around the world, including the global Gold Quill Awards and the Canadian Silver Leaf Awards. To reflect the local nature of the program, the scores needed to win a Virtuoso Award have been slightly lowered when compared to those needed to win a Gold Quill or Silver Leaf Award.
Entries are reviewed using standardized scoring and criteria. Winning entries must demonstrate that they have met clearly stated objectives, show originality and demonstrate results based on measured outcomes. Evaluators will consider how well a program was conceived and executed, how appropriate the chosen strategy and objectives were for the audience and desired results, and how the outcomes were measured and achieved.
Evaluators follow the scoring criteria that is presented in ‘The Midas Touch’ documents. All entrants are encouraged to review these documents before preparing their entries:
- How-To Guide for IABC Awards: The Midas Touch Divisions 1, 2 and 3
- How-To Guide for IABC Awards: The Midas Touch Division 4
The Seven-Point Scale of Excellence
To ensure objectivity, all entries are evaluated using IABC’s Seven-Point Scale of Excellence. All marks start at four, which represents a fully competent approach to communication planning and execution. Work is graded up or down, depending on the content and execution of the project. Marks of seven or one are very rare. Half-points may be awarded.
|7||Outstanding||An extraordinary or insightful approach or result|
|6||Significantly better than average||Demonstrates an innovative, strategic approach; takes all elements into account and delivers significant results|
|5||Better than average||Demonstrates a strategic approach and aligns the communication solution with the business need to deliver meaningful results|
|4||Average||Competent approach or results; professionally sound and appropriate|
|3||Somewhat less than satisfactory||Several key elements that are critical to the strategy or execution are missing, incorrect or under-represented|
|2||An inadequate approach or result||A significant number of critical elements are missing|
|1||Poor||Work that is wrong, inappropriate or not answered|
All entries that score between 5.0 and 5.11 will receive an Award of Merit. All those entries that score above 5.12 will receive an Award of Excellence. There are no limitations to the number of awards presented in any given category.
In addition, the top-scoring entries from each division will receive a Best of the Best Award. In order for a Best of the Best to be awarded, there must be at least two entries in the division that have earned an Award of Excellence.
- Divisions 1, 2 and 3 – Communication Management, Research and Education: 50 per cent of the marks are for the work plan and 50 per cent for the work sample
- Division 4 – Communications Skills: The score is based on the work sample and its creativity, professional execution and alignment